The impact of the COVID-19 lockdown on retinopathy of prematurity screening and management in the United States: a multicenter study.

PURPOSE: To study the effect of the pandemic-related lockdown (physical distance measures and movement restrictions) on the characteristics and management of retinopathy of prematurity (ROP). METHODS: In this controlled, multicenter cohort study, the medical records of patients born prematurely and screened for ROP in the neonatal intensive care unit during four time periods were reviewed retrospectively: (1) November 1, 2018, to March 15, 2019; (2) March 16, 2019, to August 2, 2019 (lockdown control period); (3) November 1, 2019, to March 15, 2020; and (4) March 16, 2020-August 2, 2020. RESULTS: A total of 1,645 patients met inclusion criteria. Among the 1,633 patients with complete data, mean gestational age (GA) at birth was 28.2, 28.4, 28.0, and 28.3 weeks across time periods 1 to 4, respectively (P = 0.16). The mean birth weight of all patients was 1079.1 ± 378.60 g, with no significant variation across time periods (P = 0.08). There were fewer patients screened during the lockdown period (n = 411) compared with the period immediately before (n = 491) and the same period in the prior year (n = 533). Significantly more patients were screened using indirect ophthalmoscopy, compared to digital imaging (telemedicine), during the lockdown (P < 0.01). There were 11.7%, 7.7%, 9.0%, and 8.8% of patients requiring treatment in each time period, respectively (P = 0.42), with a median postmenstrual age at initial treatment of 37.2, 36.45, 37.1, and 36.3 weeks, respectively (P = 0.32). CONCLUSIONS: We recorded a decrease in the number of infants meeting criteria for ROP screening during the lockdown. The GA at birth and birth weight did not differ. Significantly more infants were screened with indirect ophthalmoscopy, compared to digital imaging, during the lockdown.

Coats plus in prematurity.

BACKGROUND: Coats plus syndrome or cerebroretinal microangiopathy with calcifications and cysts (CMCC) is an exceedingly rare autosomal recessive disorder that predominantly affects the microvasculature in the retina, brain, bones, and gastrointestinal system. Unlike Coats disease, CMCC is bilateral and affects multiple organ systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Case report. RESULTS: We report the case of two brothers with Coats Plus syndrome who presented with variable phenotypic expression. One sibling (Patient 1) was thought to have atypical retinopathy of prematurity and was only diagnosed with Coats plus after his older brother (Patient 2) presented with a seizure and a left upper extremity tremor at 4 years of age. The CTC1 mutation was confirmed in both patients. Aggressive treatment with laser photocoagulation and intravitreal bevacizumab dramatically improved the retinal vascular and exudative changes. CONCLUSION: Coats Plus syndrome can have a variable phenotypic presentation, including retinal vascular findings. This rare genetic disease should be in the differential diagnosis in patients who present with atypical retinal pathology, including Retinopathy of Prematurity, Familial Exudative Vitreoretinopathy, or Coats disease associated with non-specific multiorgan abnormalities.

Evaluation of a revised care plan for babies with retinopathy of prematurity during SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in India.

Purpose: To analyze the impact of a revised care plan for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) during SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in a tertiary eye care facility in eastern India. Methods: In a retrospective study, we analyzed the medical records of babies managed for ROP during the peak of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic, with particular reference to the challenges, and the revised strategies addressing travel restrictions for five months, from April to August 2020. The strategy included selective referral (babies with higher treatment probability), longer follow-up intervals (babies with non-alarming findings), use of locally available workforce, and teleconsultation whenever feasible. Results: In the given period, 222 babies were examined versus 624 in the preceding year (P = 0.001). The average gestational age, birth weight, and postmenstrual age at presentation were 30.4 weeks, 1.31 kg, and 37.7 weeks, respectively. The first examination was on time in 40.1% of babies but was delayed by a median of 23 days in the remaining babies. In the cohort, 56.7% of babies had any ROP, and 27.9% required treatment (versus 8.8% in the previous year; P < 0.001). The intravitreal anti-vascular growth factor (anti-VEGF) injection was more often used than in the previous year (n = 72 vs 36; P < 0.0001). The treatment outcome was comparable before and after the SARS-CoV-2 lockdown period. There was no report of health issues among the care providers attributable to ROP care. Conclusion: The revised strategy resulted in a smaller pool of babies screened but a larger proportion of babies treated for ROP. This strategy could be used more profitably in future ROP care.

Comparing the diagnostic accuracy of telemedicine utilization versus in-person clinical examination for retinopathy of prematurity in premature infants: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: To synthesize the literature assessing the diagnostic accuracy of telemedicine evaluation compared with clinical examination for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) in premature infants. METHODS: Covidence software was used to conduct a systematic literature search from September 14, 2020, through September 27, 2020, on MEDLINE (Ovid), EMBASE (Ovid), CINAHL, and the gray literature to identify studies relevant to telemedicine utilization for ROP detection. After duplicate removal and two-levels of screening, studies comparing telemedicine evaluation with binocular indirect ophthalmoscopic examination were included. Risk of bias assessment was conducted for the included studies following data extraction. A qualitative review was performed to summarize estimates of accuracy of ROP evaluation by telemedicine. RESULTS: A total of 507 studies were reviewed, of which 323 were found in EMBASE, 115 in MEDLINE, and 79 in CINAHL. Three possibly relevant conference abstracts were found. Following duplicate removal, 410 studies were reviewed based on titles and abstracts. Subsequently, 19 articles were thoroughly examined, and 14 studies (2,655 participants) were included. Most studies found that telemedicine performance for detecting ROP was comparable to ophthalmic examination, especially with regard to identifying treatment-requiring ROP. CONCLUSIONS: Telemedicine evaluation can reliably detect ROP. Incorporation of telemedicine into conventional neonatal care has the potential to improve access to ROP care.

The safety and feasibility of the screening for retinopathy of prematurity assisted by telemedicine network during COVID-19 pandemic in Wuhan, China.

BACKGROUND: During the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) epidemic, due to the traffic blockade and the shortage of medical resources, more and more premature infants could not receive timely and effective ROP screening, which delayed treatment and even caused children blindness. Therefore, how to carry out ROP screening safely and effectively during the epidemic was very important and urgent. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and feasibility of ROP screening assisted by telemedicine network during COVID-19 outbreak. METHODS: This retrospective study was conducted at Wuhan Children's hospital in Wuhan, China, from January to October, 2020. The measures which were performed to make the ROP screening more safe and effective were summarized and the comparison between ROP screening assisted by telemedicine network in 2020 and usual screening in 2019 were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 267 outpatient infants completed ROP screening. The median gestational age was 32 weeks (30w to 34w) and the median birth weight was 1780 g (1460 g to 2100 g). Meanwhile, 149 (55.8%) out of 267 infants were males. During January to May in 2020, 86 screening appointments were received, among which 67 (77.9%) were from telemedicine platform online. The completing percentage of total online ROP appointments was higher than that of total face-to-face appointments (58.1% VS 22. 1%, P = 0.018). As for the number of infants screened between 2020 and 2019 from Februaryto October, 54 infants completed ROP screening in 2020, which was higher than that (51participants) in 2019 on September. Furthermore, compared with the usual screening in 2019, ROP screening assisted by telemedicine network in 2020 had smaller gestational age (32w VS 33w, p<0.001) and lower birth weight (1780 g VS 1900 g, p = 0.001). However, of the 267 infants screened, 18(6.7%) had ROP while the percentage of ROP screened in 2019 was the same (44[6.7%]). During follow-up, none of medical staffs was infected and no adverse reaction was reported. CONCLUSIONS: The screening for retinopathy of prematurity assisted by telemedicine network was safe and feasible during the COVID-19 pandemic. Preventive measures before and after screening were very necessary, which could effectively avoid cross infection.

Virus containment box for retinopathy of prematurity screening and laser.

PURPOSE: Health care workers are susceptible to contracting infection with COVID-19 by aerosol transmission. This is a risk while examining and/or treating an un-sedated neonate in retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) screening and treatment. But screening for neonates for ROP and treating with laser, when required, should not be delayed to avoid the blindness. We describe a cost-effective method of containing aerosols generated during such a procedure in an un-sedated baby. METHODS: An acrylic transparent containment box was prepared to accommodate an average-sized infant. The box had four walls and a roof. The floor was open to place the container box over the baby. The walls have two types of openings, large ones to allow passage of hands to examine the baby, small ones to enable passage of oxygen tubing when required. A simulation was created to examine the impact of aerosol spray on examining healthcare personnel. RESULTS: The cost of the acrylic box was negligible. It could be assembled locally with available acrylic sheets and craftsmen. It was not difficult to examine the baby inside the box, and the simulation demonstrated that it protected the health personnel from the aerosol contamination. CONCLUSION: The described method is likely to increase healthcare personnel's confidence not to delay or deny ROP screening and laser treatment and save the babies from blindness.